Brotha’s Gonna Work It Out.

by Panama Jackson on July 2, 2008 · 282 comments

in theory

One of the main premises that’s arisen out of the myriad discussions that have occurred here at VSB.com is this:

Men and women just plain out view things differently.

I’ve long contended that the major reason that men and women butt heads so much is that men and women refuse to acknowledge the fact that we’ll never truly understand why we each do the things we do. Women think men are complex and men think that men are simple.

Men think that women are irrationally emotional and women think that women are only responding to the energy that men bring forth. It’s a tangled web we weave.

It’s like we eat because we’re fat. But we’re fat because we can’t stop eating. It’s a vicious cycle.

One interesting place where these differences arise that I, as a man, can’t really comprehend why the difference occurs is here:

When dating, men look for ass first and end up finding meaning with a woman. Women on the other hand look for meaning from the beginning and get surprised when men tend to be the very jackass that their daddy (if he was even there) told them to avoid. What this basically means is that women are always hoping for the best and probably hopeless romantics. But the problem with always hoping for the best is that there’s another half to that equation, and the two equal up to life. The second half is to prepare for the worst.

So when many women seem to be enthusiastically miffed the f*ck up by a man who only wants to see her naked, I’m genuinely surprised. Especially since every single woman I know believes that men just want to see them in their skivvies anyway. Yet somehow, even the most practical and pragmatic women is honestly shocked, dismayed, and disappointed when a cat she had high hopes for shows his ass as the South Street Slut Sleeper.

Now of course, I tend to believe that at their core, women are better people than men. Women operate on feelings and warm and fuzzy places. And men, well, we like warm and fuzzy places. Attached to legs. It isn’t that men aren’t good people, it’s just we’re more animally instinctual. We like to pounce on things and women make such fun things to pounce on. Grr.

Now there’s probably a good reason for the difference in women’s attitudes towards dating et al. Women are socialized to be more passive and to basically not be whores – which is good. Being a whore seems like it’d totally suck.

Um, no pun intended.

But the thing is that I think we men have it right when it comes to choosing our mates. We get all the whorishness out of our system and then decide its time to settle down and get us a wife and make a family. Most women just look for the first thing smoking instead of giving themselves the opportunity to fully explore themselves and let their soul glow.

They don’t let it shine through.

I understand why women seek out a husband first and then start dating, but I don’t really get it. Mostly because I know good and doggone well that as a man, it seems like there’s just too much to do before you get married.

But maybe it’s not for me to really understand anyway. Maybe that’s the beauty that is women. All full of hopes and dreams and belief in men allowing for the continuation of the species.

Good thing I’m a man then…since you’re hopes and dreams ensure that a brotha’s gonna get a chance to work it out.

And isn’t that what it’s really all about anyway?

-VSB P aka THE ARSONIST

Bookmark and Share

Related posts:

  1. work it, baby
  2. link of the week: “who’s gonna save my soul?”
  3. I Work, I Get the Job Done
  4. Guest Blog: A Job Ain’t Nothin’ But Work.
  5. Relationship Downfall Week: Hyundai With a Ferrari Engine

{ 280 comments… read them below or add one }

1 Miss Patterson July 2, 2008 at 1:00 am

Panama, I agree with everything you’re stating here. But the main reason why we look for husband material first, the main reason why we ‘hope for the best’ and put all of our eggs in one basket and all that is because our parents raised us to be little princesses. My mother wouldn’t let me date until I was 17 AND she sent me to all-girl schools for 9 years! We are socialized to search for ‘the one’, though sadly our male counterparts are brought up to ‘sew their wild oats’. I sort of wish my parents encouraged me to date more, and not get focused on one guy. But then again in our society, if a woman isn’t a one woman man she’s labeled as a ho. Bottom line is, I blame the parents.

Reply

2 Elenda July 2, 2008 at 6:20 am

@Miss Patterson. I blame the parents too but for different reasons. I wanted to get married right out of high school but since I wasn’t pregnant, my mom told me I needed to explore some more and NOT put all my eggs in the one basket. Parents are huge interferers and walking contradictions. Well, at least my mom is.

Reply

3 The Champ July 2, 2008 at 8:30 am

“Parents are huge interferers”

sounds like your mom interfered in a good way

Reply

4 Elenda July 2, 2008 at 9:22 am

@Champ. Not!!! I could be married with 4 kids and have military benefits!

Reply

5 The Champ July 2, 2008 at 10:24 am

so if you could go back you’d change the decision that was made?

Reply

6 Elenda July 2, 2008 at 10:34 am

@Champ. I sure would. I understand the butterfly affect so I know everything as I know it would be different and that’s kewl with me. I should have followed my heart and not my mother!

Reply

7 GOODENess July 2, 2008 at 3:04 pm

I read “married”…”4 kids”…and “benefits”…but do you think you would be happy? I mean this is completely hypothetical…but I got married to my high school sweetheart but I wasn’t the same person then that I am now… unless you think your almost husband is/was the kind of man that would support and encourage personal growth (even if it takes you outside the home/relationship) you would, more than likely, become dissatisfied with your life and think of the opportunites you passed up as you raced down the aisle…just a young divorced woman’s opinion…

Reply

8 Elenda July 2, 2008 at 3:13 pm

@Goodness. Yes, I still talk to my high school sweet heart. He is on his second marriage and first child. I would have been very happy with him back then. He was my biggest cheerleader and thought the world of me. He would have encouraged me to walk on water if I told him that’s what I wanted to do. I sure knew how to pick up back then… (sigh) We grew in different directions though so we can NEVER be together now.

And back then, being married and having kids would have made me super happy. Let see, my oldest would be about 8 or 9 and I am sure, I could have maintained a career that was fit for me. Family has always been more important than work. Maybe it’s just me. I’m just the settling down type. Don’t get it twisted though I have experienced every stage from partying daily, stalking my fav college boo , pimping suga daddies, and now live in wifey. But if I knew then what I know now, I would have married him when he asked me to.

Reply

9 Miss Patterson July 2, 2008 at 10:20 am

oh yeh, i blame barbie & ken too. i had like 20 barbie dolls (in every color and nationality) and only 1 KEN doll. ONE! Seriously, all insanity aside…this shit starts when we’re young. 20 barbies competing over one man…one singular prototype. (and before you ask it’s not because I didn’t want more Ken dolls they made like 2 varieties of Ken -malibu ken and more grown up ken) what am i saying? i’m saying the socialization of young girls and women runs deep. It runs as deep as Mattel, Inc. (i need coffee now)

Reply

10 Intellectual Hedonist July 2, 2008 at 10:41 am

I blame Disney! Sleeping Beauty, Snow White, Cinderella, even Alladin. All these princesses looking for their one prince. No whoring around. Even the Disney Soundtracks continue to model the role a young princess should play: “Someday your prince will come” “When you wish upon a star”

Disney is EVIL!

Reply

11 GOODENess July 2, 2008 at 3:06 pm

***alter call on Easter Sunday***

Reply

12 willnotbetelevised July 2, 2008 at 8:47 am

SOW!

sorry I’m a Virgo. misuse of common phrases bothers me. I apologize for the outburst. You shoulda seen me screaming during katrina coverage when people couldn’t say laughingstock. Sigh

Reply

13 Miss Patterson July 2, 2008 at 9:59 am

damn! damn! damn! —i just recovered the points i lost for “sow not sew” because i know both the name of the actress and character who delivered that line in which show and which season. earlier phrase transgression forgiven. (smile)

Reply

14 Leila July 2, 2008 at 10:45 am

I agree. Parents are huge interferers. My parents wouldn’t let me date until I was 18! I started dating my first semester of college and that was not a good idea because it made me so naive when it came to guys. I would see guys for their potential instead of what they were and wasted time with the wrong guys for years.

Reply

15 GOODENess July 2, 2008 at 3:09 pm

yeah that ish right there facilitates a phenomenon that we at the University of Houston (main campus) called “getting bopped” the naive girls that went home at winter break and didn’t come back because santa brought them baby daddies for Chri’muh…

Reply

16 miss t-lee July 2, 2008 at 4:30 pm

bopped huh?
Texas finest. :)

Reply

17 Ms. Devereaux July 2, 2008 at 1:10 am

You are pretty on point with everthing you are saying and you have a clear view on the man/woman thing. As Miss Patterson stated we as women were taught at an early age to save ourselves, no man wants a ho, and we can’t do the same things men do. Everyone who grew up with a brother knows their brother got away with way more than she did simply because he was a boy. I think nowadays women are allowed to be more sexually free especially with what the media feeds. Examples: Samantha ‘Sex in the City”, Lynn “Girlfriends”, Feeby” Friends” and there are more examples. All these women potray that it is ok to sleep around, just like men do because they are supposedly in touch with their sexuality. Unfortunately this game doesn’t work.

As you stated men and women are wired differently, thats just how it is. Anytime a woman tries to play the same game a man plays we lose. We are emotional creatures. We want love, support, stability, and respect. This is what we are taught we will get with a husband. Hence the reason we look for this first. Dating can only be fun for a while. Women are wired to be married and be with one person because we are soooo emotionally driven.

Reply

18 Elenda July 2, 2008 at 6:17 am

“Dating can only be fun for a while” this statement along outlines the problem. In fact, I want a t-shirt that says just that.

Reply

19 genius khan July 2, 2008 at 9:02 am

Ms Devereaux waxes wise Elenda concurs:

“Dating can only be fun for a while”

you can say the same thing about pizza, cars, music, school and YOU CAN DAM THE F*** SURE SAY IT ABOUT MARRIAGE.

Marriage is only fun for a while

would you wear that t-shirt? LOL!

Reply

20 Elenda July 2, 2008 at 9:24 am

@GK. I’ll pass on that one. I believe in th “happily ever after” theory :-) Then again, I am not married yet.

Reply

21 genius khan July 2, 2008 at 12:19 pm

Elenda keep living.

…never never land, right next to peter pan and nobody wants to grow old. Lyfe Jennings

Reply

22 GOODENess July 2, 2008 at 3:11 pm

@GK I just KNOW you didn’t type MUSIC in that list of temporary fun-tivities!!!

next time you come to the corner, I am gonna wax that azz!

Reply

23 The Champ July 2, 2008 at 1:58 pm

“As you stated men and women are wired differently, thats just how it is. Anytime a woman tries to play the same game a man plays we lose.”

****”the prayer” skit on dmx’s “its dark and hell is hot”****

Reply

24 Ebony July 2, 2008 at 1:56 am

“women are always hoping for the best and probably hopeless romantics.”

Most of us are emotionally driven as Ms. Devereaux said. We want to see the best in the men we choose to date. As I stated in yesterday’s post, I think us cutting ourselves off from the dating pool immediately upon meeting a guy is a huge mistake.

Reply

25 Eathan July 2, 2008 at 9:56 am

I agree, we are wired different. I always suggest to female friends to keep dating others and they refuse. They always want to put all their eggs in one basket and then get upset when they end up disappointed. I don’t get that at all. Just out differences, I guess.

Reply

26 Nut July 2, 2008 at 2:56 am

THE ARSONIST said
Now there’s probably a good reason for the difference in women’s attitudes towards dating et al. Women are socialized to be more passive and to basically not be whores – which is good. Being a whore seems like it’d totally suck.

Yes being a whore sucks so why is it that men choose it? Where is your socialization and why are you not huntin for it? I don’t understand this logic. Whorein’ around is a double edged sword. Nothing good comes from it even for men. It’s just not a good look for either gender. For the record a man over 35 with getting the panties as his only knowledge of women is super wack. When whoring around you tend to practice relating with no intention of positive growth. Being decietful is what you learn being a whore. You will intern be nothing but a well practiced….well you get the picture. While all types of relationship are important in my opinion I just think that our emotional selves could do without the ‘what not to do’ training; it makes some people heartless, cold and unable to communicate effectivly. To grow with someone with an open heart and mind can be enchanting and it doesn’t mean that you will marry them either; just a positive life lesson. Why not set youself up for relationship success? Meaningful relations is the key. One on one is the best, I’ve always felt that is when you can see yourself the clearest. When focusing on how one person sees you and reacts to you is the best way to refine and define yourself. I never understood the logic behind denying yourself that opportunity. Just my two cents. If most men thought this way there would be alot less slashed tires and sistas with baggage. Not to mention that it would probably be easier to get the goodies.

And why this topic? At the end of the day somebodies gonna be in the corner (I’m thinkin’ Goodness ’cause yall always got that sista in the corner. Keep ya head up sis). Somebodies gonna be mad at Champ or Panama. With atleast one request for cambodian breast milk. Why you want the fam to fight man? Hommies over the ho issue man. Just think about it.

I’m tired as hell and in my head this commet was witty and insightful; so if it ain’t send me a smile and pertend that it was.

I don’t mind being lied to I dated brother or two back in the day ;) And it’s for a good cause. Just jokes, just jokes :-)

…………….you know how much we like dem smilies…

Reply

27 Elenda July 2, 2008 at 6:24 am

I should have read your comment before I wrote my own. I concur.

“a man over 35 with getting the panties as his only knowledge of women is super wack.”

If a man is still a player past 30, that dude is wack and immature. Seriously, do something with you life!

Reply

28 No More Heroes July 2, 2008 at 9:16 am

I think an issue is that people dont understand that certain people just do not want certain things. Im not over 30, but I am at the age where “society” is saying I need to start looking for a wife. I like the fact that I can have a nice romantic dinner with a classy lady. I also like the fact that I can go to the club, catch a freaky dime and and do a one-nighter. No one is being mislead because I pretty much walk around with a shirt that says “I dont want a relationship”. Is a man who dates as freely as he wants immature, or is he just aware of what he wants and makes no qualms about it?

Reply

29 Elenda July 2, 2008 at 9:26 am

@No More Heroes. He’s immature. What’s his reasonf or not wanting to settle down? Is he asexual. Oh no, he’s not because he does freaky dimes regularly. FOH!

Reply

30 No More Heroes July 2, 2008 at 9:35 am

But for what reason? Why is he immature? What difference does it make whats is reason is? If a man doesnt want to be a father is he immature for never having children? I know women who dont want children, are they immature too? Or are people immature because they dont fit to your standards?

Reply

31 Elenda July 2, 2008 at 9:47 am

@No More Heroes. YES! I am a judgemental B*tch and I believe if you are a certain age, you should be at a certain stage in life. Kind of like if you are age 6, you should be in the first grade (kindergarten if your birthday is late) and you should be doing certain 6-year old things.

If you are 30, you should be ready to settle down unless you have a great excuse. For example: if you had kids at 18 and didn’t get a change to wile out, you are excused; but I expect your @ss to get back on track in 5 years. LOL! Also, it’s also like a 40 year old man rocking some cornrolls to his 9-5. FOH!

Not having kids is a mature decision. Even I say if I am 32 and NOT pregnant, I am not having any. I don’t want kids when I am too old to care for them or have NO patience for them. Js.

What is your reason for not wanting to settle down? I need to know. I’ll tell you if it is good enough for me.

Reply

32 Deviant July 2, 2008 at 9:51 am

That has nothing to do with maturity. Some people should never settle down and some people should never have kids. Some people just don’t come equipped with the tools to do those things and they shouldn’t be forced or pressured to conform to someone elses standard on what a person should be doing at a certain age.
In addition people are just different. Some peole are ready to settle down and get married at twenty and some people reach the age at 50. There is nothing wrong with that. It shouldn’t be a automatic negative mark because you are single or childless at 30, or 40 or whatever. If you want to demerit someone do it for more valid reasons.
I know myself that I am in no hurry to do either and I will not do it just because people on the outside no matter who they are say I should’ve done this by now. That rationale I feel is ridiculous. I’ll do both when I feel I’m good and ready. Plus and grandfather told me I shouldn’t even consider doin anything like that till I am over 35. He said I need to be doin me. I figure he knows what he is talking about

Reply

33 No More Heroes July 2, 2008 at 9:59 am

Couldnt have said it better. People are so blinded by what society tells them they should do that they look down upon others who dont share the same view.

Reply

34 Elenda July 2, 2008 at 9:59 am

@Deviant. No offense but your grandfather is full. How old was he when you got married and reproduced. I bet you all the money in my account (and today is pay day) that it was not 35! You better start considering the souce before you take advice from some old dude that is a walking contradiction. (cooling down now)

Neither one of you men have given me a valid reason as to why you are NOT ready? So you are going to wait until you are 35 to have kids and get married?FOH! You do know that the average person is 70 when they die!!!!!!!! What are you waiting on?!?! Time ain’t fa eva (Poetic Justice quote for those wondering)

Reply

35 Deviant July 2, 2008 at 10:11 am

He was young thats why he told me to wait. My reason is I don’t want to. Thas all the reason you need. I could drop dead tomorrow does that mean I shoudl get married and knock someone up today? How is that a sound decision?

Reply

36 The Champ July 2, 2008 at 10:27 am

“In addition people are just different. Some peole are ready to settle down and get married at twenty and some people reach the age at 50. There is nothing wrong with that. It shouldn’t be a automatic negative mark because you are single or childless at 30, or 40 or whatever. If you want to demerit someone do it for more valid reasons.”

***take 6***

Reply

37 Elenda July 2, 2008 at 10:41 am

@The champ. “Even if you look at it from a more worldly black community aspect, one of the reasons why our community is struggling is because so many of our people are having children and starting families much, much, much earlier than they’re supposed to.”

I totally agree with this statement. And how are people having kids… by having sex. And aren’t most people NOT READY to settle down the ones having the sex that is producing the kids destroying the families?

What is earlier than supposed to? People have been have kids fresh out of high school back when my grand and great-grands were alive and living.

Reply

38 miss t-lee July 2, 2008 at 1:45 pm

” It shouldn’t be a automatic negative mark because you are single or childless at 30, or 40 or whatever.”

Champ—thanks for these words of wisdom.

Reply

39 Elenda July 2, 2008 at 10:06 am

@No more heroes. You can not pick and chose which society rules you want to follow. If society tells you to wrap it up b4 you stick it into that “freaky dime” in the club, you’ll do it. But if society tells you to stop destroying families in black america by refusing to marry and live with your family, you say you are not ready! Riiiiiiiiiiigggggggghhhhhhhhhttttttttttt (not budging from soapbox)

Reply

40 Deviant July 2, 2008 at 10:14 am

you shouldn’t do anything cause thats what society tells you. You should make decisions based on your moral code and what you are confortable with. Who gives a fuck what the other primates think?

Reply

41 V Renee July 2, 2008 at 10:17 am

I actually agree with ‘no more heros’. Society does try to dictate how people should live their lives, when it shouldn’t. Not just in regards to marriage, but life in general. There’s always talk about what you “should be” doing at certain stages in life. I don’t understand why people can’t do what they feel they are READY for. The person will know when they are ready, and by forcing them to make a decision, 9 times out of 10 it will not end good. I think that’s why the divorce rate is so high now – society says they should be married with kids, and when they get in, it’s like damn I wasn’t ready for this.

Reply

42 No More Heroes July 2, 2008 at 10:18 am

Actually I’ll wrap it up because I dont want my penis to fall off. I dont blame society for that, I blame the sex-ed class for showing all those “people with STD” slides.

You just picked a rule you didnt want to follow; you said you didnt want kids. You also picked a rule you would follow, which is to settle down. Right?

And what what would be worse, not getting married and being free to do whatever without hurting anyone, or getting married and hurting my wife by cheating on her every week, because I wasnt ready to settle down?

You keep looking for a reason why I dont want to settle down, my point is that IS the reason. I dont want to. I am not ready. Why is that not enough?

People told me I needed to go to college right after high school, like most people in society. You know what happened? I went there, bullshitted, got in debt and left. I wasnt ready then. I went later when I matured and everything is good. But how much time did I waste by going when I wasnt ready, trying to conform?

Reply

43 The Champ July 2, 2008 at 10:32 am

elenda, everybody has their own path, their personal own timeline. i actually think that realizing that youre not ready for that type of committment and staying away from it is much more mature than just shacking up because your age “dictates” it.

and, even if you look at it from a more worldly black community aspect, one of the reasons why our community is struggling is because so many of our people are having children and starting families much, much, much earlier than they’re supposed to.

Reply

44 Nut July 2, 2008 at 2:19 pm

What I was tring to say was that a man or woman at 35 who’s only experience is whoring is damaged goods and there is no double standard in existance that will excuse this.

I don’t think there is a set age that anyone should get married, but I do think there should be a limit to the youthful humping. Is that wrong? I think that men are as emotionaly sensitive as women they are just more willing to hide and abuse their emotional side. This is what I don’t understand. It can be stated and accepted by women that we are masocist when in comes to affairs of the heart, but men are too. Again no good comes from whoring around for a man or a woman. Dating on the other hand is something different.

a date is a person with whom one has such a social appointment or engagement could include sex but it’s not just sex.

a whore is a person considered as having compromised principles for personal gain, just a nut.

When relating there is a existing connection that can be explored beyond the physical. Chosing not to explore that makes you a whore.

Does believing this make me judgemental? I really would like to know.

Reply

45 genius khan July 2, 2008 at 9:27 am

Nut cross examines: “Yes being a whore sucks so why is it that men choose it? Where is your socialization and why are you not huntin for it?”

ok so men choose to be whores but we are only whoring around with good women? is that it? poor women bad, bad, menfolk. laughable!

women and men are all whores, (in 1 sense or another) just with different price tags.

Nut theorizes: “When focusing on how one person sees you and reacts to you is the best way to refine and define yourself. I never understood the logic behind denying yourself that opportunity.”

i’m not sure you understand your own logic. try substantiating what you said without changing your statement?

here’s your quote again: “When focusing on how one person sees you and reacts to you is the best way to refine and define yourself.”

Q: now how exactly is this?

you don’t have to deny yourself the oppurtunity to best refine and define urself because you don’t have a S.O. like you can’t get the feedback from someONE else in your life like a mother, brother, sister, father, lover, friend etc. IF, IF, IF, IF that’s the best way to refine and/or define yourself. (and i don’t think it’s the best way {having A girlfriend orwife, A boyfriend or husband})

i’m not buying this and it’s not about making a case to whore. i don’t need validation to whore if that’s what i want to do and i’m certainly not trying to persuade anyone else to who errr it up.

nice try Nut but in my eyes this statement is fugazi.

Reply

46 Nut July 2, 2008 at 12:23 pm

Ok @ Genius this statement was written after sixteen straight hours of paperwork and my brain was fried, but I stand behind my point.

My statement was
When focusing on how one person sees you and reacts to you is the best way to refine and define yourself.”

If you are bed hopping you are not as concerned about that person as you are about the physical attraction; you tend to miss the details. Like when I dated alot I did the one nighters too. With the one nighters I cannot remeber that person beyond the sex. And yes I do think that I was whoring around so my statements are from experience. The men that I took the time to listen to understand them as a person not just a penis are so different; I learned alot about myself and what I needed in a partner. Met some good ones and some not so good. Learned fast that one night stands were not for me. Now a cut buddie maybe but that was a long time ago. I didn’t marry them all either and didn’t intend to. Again I think that all interactions with the opposite sex are important. I said that in the first post, but you skiped that part. I am an emotional creature and it took experiences for me to define it and then refine the way I reacted to that fact.

So my question is why when you know all of this men are ok with continuing on this path? Don’t you see that all the nasty attachments that women get from whoring men get too, yall are just cool with it; you admitted that. I don’t understand that. Damaged goods I tell ya is not a good look.

Reply

47 GOODENess July 2, 2008 at 3:20 pm

@NUT…thanks for the “luv” on the corner…lol…

but I am going to have to “quibble” (like Tyler be typing er’day) with you on some ish…while I do think “ho-ing around” is something that one must eventually grow out of…I take issue on two points:

point 1 – not everyone “grows” at the same rate so it’s unfair to assign ages (ie the magical age of wisdom is apparently 30-35 up in here) to the point in time when a man (or woman for that matter) should “settle down”…if you do it before you’re ready…you’re not “settling down”, you’re just “settling”…and that’s not a good look for Barbie OR Ken…

point 2 – I think we need to acknowledge (and perhaps clarify) that being over 30 and single does not mean you are ho-ing…I mean there is a VAST gray area between “single” and “ho”…and we can’t assume that a single 33 year old man is still dipping and dapping…he may have just come out of a long term joint, or is a serial dater…or a plethora of other things…casually dating, doesn’t necessarily mean casually f*cking, and that’s regardless of gender…

Reply

48 southernabelle July 2, 2008 at 3:43 pm

@Good: I totally agree.. we all are sums of our life exp.. different places in our lives – and I can’t fault him or her- if they aren’t ready…All my college frds that married young are mostly bitter and aloof about marriage..why ? They didn’t get a chance to know themselves-the men are pissed..she is not the same-she thinks he’s selfish… ( he always was- the DI had her nose open) …Knowing you want to someday be married is good- knowing who your are and who you will be IN a marriage – as a partner is even better…

Reply

49 Nut July 2, 2008 at 5:43 pm

See I know what I’m sayin but expressing that and doing my work proves to be very difficult. I agree with you @Goodness. What I said was

“For the record a man over 35 with getting the panties as his only knowledge of women is super wack. When whoring around you tend to practice relating with no intention of positive growth”

and what i ment was if a man only knows how to get the panties off but not how to date, have an adult conversation, share his passion about a life goal with a woman he is an emotional mess and damaged goods. I will not take that back.

My point, that was not well stated, is that it takes alot to mature therefore we have to practice it all not just the sex part. I am not saying that if a man is unmarried at 35 with no kids he’s damaged goods, maybe he is not ready to settle down and that’s ok. but if he is 35 and has never had atleast on substantial relationship what is he dating for? Sounds like an ass hunter to me. It would make me think twice maybe three four times.

We all are sums of our life experiences and when that only (please note the only) experience that you have to is I can get the panties in one nite or you can make my eyes roll to the back of my head makes you a penis with a man attached to it. And no grown ass woman wants that. Just my opinion.

Maybe it’s that I’m doing this summer program here in Atlanta and there are all these 14 year old mothers who’s baby daddies are all 35 and older (did it in two other states also). It’s more common than you think. What is the most common in most of the said baby daddies is that they are men who have practiced being whores for so long that the only females that they can relate to are the ones still rolling around in puberty. They were looking for the right one too. Sad.

I’m a realist. Maybe because I was made to talk to several grown azz men who could not, would not take adult responsibilty I got a little over the top so for that I apologize. I’ll keep my frustration over here with all this damn paper work that seems to not be going away no matter how much time I spend on VSB in hopes that it would just evaporate. Here is where I find my love for black folks again. I’ll just go back to being a lurker, maybe I’ll get more work done.

But understand @Genius, D and most of the brothers on this board are a rare breed. I’m sure with your mind and intent that you can have a hit and run every now and again but please include something else more meaningful that doesn’t involve marriage (i like marrige it’s kinda cool, but not for everybody and I understand that). I wouldn’t consider yall damaged goods; I’m sorry if it was offensive. Ok I am judgemental but consider the source. I’m older than 35 and I’m married. I hear alot of bullshit all damn day.

Reply

50 GOODENess July 2, 2008 at 6:24 pm

ok…I am feeling you…and I cosign…especially on the “rare breed” ness of our VSB brothas…it’s a shame none of them live in TX…or at least I don’t think they do…lol (raises eyebrow) hmmmmm?

Reply

51 Xquizzyt1 July 2, 2008 at 3:25 am

I’m halfway only commenting because I’ve never commented this far up before!!! Woohoo.I’m usually somewhere at like the 186 mark. Lol but seriously, I was just talking about this the other day, only my conversation took it further with regard to men. Men love to tell women they’re “not ready” for marriage. This however, is usually not the case. When a man says he’s not ready for marriage that’s usually a nice way of saying he doesn’t want to marry YOU. I say this bec. I have seen PLENTY of girlfriends who were with Mr. Unready for 10, 12, 15 years and he’s not ready. They break up because she gets tired of waiting and he marries the “new” chick after 6 weeks. Men want the same shit women do, they are just not raised to feel like it’s their life’s mission to get it.They have more fun during the search.

Reply

52 genius khan July 2, 2008 at 9:54 am

Xquizzyt1 i won’t knok your personal observations. i’m sure you have seen what you’ve described but i offer that most men are a lot more cautious about accepting the responsibilities of marriage than women. in atleast 1 sense, biologically they can afford to be. in my eyes the responsibilities are a lot more for the man socialy, financially and in most ways versus the woman.

i don’t doubt that the guys you described didn’t really feel like your girls were the one for him. i don’t know if they were committed or what. i have noticed that women seem to need to be in a relationship with a man. …and women too have something lined up before they get out of what they are in. having this need can be insecurity. feeling the need that you always gotta be with somebody. (men less so)

i found myself dating someone that i later figured out i didn’t want to marry and i felt this trapped feeling, clingyness, social expectation, like i owed her something, feeling that i would be the bad guy if i didn’t sucumb to social pressures. by the time i grew some balls and i looked up, i had been thru 2 other girls and neither was the one for me really (and they didn’t necessarily have to be) but i realized that i had been running away from the first girl.

the pressures are great, indvidually, socially, parentaly etc. sometimes a young man gotta say fuc* what they think i gotta do what’s right for me (even if it means breaking a heart) and in so doing it will be right for everyone involved. i’m not saying string someody along but recognize it can happen in a way that is no FAULT of anyone in particular. 2 good people can get together and it still not work. what’s with the victims mentality where somebody gotta ALWAYS be wrong. (and it’s never you) that’s what i take exception to. to thine own self…

Reply

53 D*Boy- D*Stroy July 2, 2008 at 11:10 am

I can’t add anything to that cause you really nailed that. I was thinking this but you certainly articulated my thoughts far better than I could. Great addition to the discussion.

Reply

54 soulfirelp July 2, 2008 at 11:15 am

you said that!

Reply

55 GOODENess July 2, 2008 at 3:30 pm

“i have noticed that women seem to need to be in a relationship with a man.”
~alright for this part, I want to clarify and define a relationship as ANY habitual interaction…we are all in a relationship here on VSB…if we (women) defined the “R” word this way…we would understand that we have what we think we want…the deal is we (women) have been brainwashed into thinking that the “R” means fidelity…and unfortunately, even though there is higher expectation of said exclusivity, that is not always the case…if you are exclusively dating a man…enjoy it…don’t drive yourself crazy about what’s going on when you aren’t in his face…that means you don’t trust him…and if you don’t trust him, you can’t love him…not happily and productively anyway…

and for this…
” …and women too have something lined up before they get out of what they are in. having this need can be insecurity.”
I agree…I the “R” word is NOT a job…you have a job lined up before you quit..but not another companion…9 times out of 10 you’re leaving because you’re not happy…nobody can define your happiness but YOU…so take time to figure out what you were really unhappy about, the role you played, adn how you won’t let that ish happen the next time around and THEN get you a pony to ride…otherwise the same ish is pretty much going to keep happening…and you won’t be able to blame others after a while…because in all those failed “R” words, the constant factor was YOU…you take YOU with you everywhere you go…so fix that b*tch first…

**shrugging** I’m just saying…

Reply

56 Leila July 2, 2008 at 12:28 pm

I don’t necessarily agree with this. People have different reasons for getting married and some couples take longer than others. I had two friends who got married last summer after being with their boyfriends for 10-11 years. They waited until they were more financially stable and mature enough to handle marriage.

Reply

57 Xquizzyt1 July 2, 2008 at 3:26 am

I’m halfway only commenting because I’ve never commented this far up before!!! Woohoo.I’m usually somewhere at like the 186 mark. Lol but seriously, I was just talking about this the other day, only my conversation took it further with regard to men.

Men love to tell women they’re “not ready” for marriage. This however, is usually not the case. When a man says he’s not ready for marriage that’s usually a nice way of saying he doesn’t want to marry YOU. I say this bec. I have seen PLENTY of girlfriends who were with Mr. Unready for 10, 12, 15 years and he’s not ready. They break up because she gets tired of waiting and he marries the “new” chick after 6 weeks.
Men want the same shit women do, they are just not raised to feel like it’s their life’s mission to get it.They have more fun during the search.

Reply

58 ForReal July 2, 2008 at 9:20 am

“Men want the same shit women do, they are just not raised to feel like it’s their life’s mission to get it.They have more fun during the search.”

Nothing but the truth!!!! Glad you commented early :-)

Reply

59 The Champ July 2, 2008 at 10:34 am

“When a man says he’s not ready for marriage that’s usually a nice way of saying he doesn’t want to marry YOU.”

not always. sometimes the dude just isn’t ready, and a lightbulb clicks in his head after he gets out of the other relationship. its all about timing. sometimes the “other chick” just doesnt meet the guy at the right time

Reply

60 ForReal July 2, 2008 at 11:56 am

So here is something I’ve always wondered- Let’s say a guy isn’t ready for marriage while dating girl A, so girl A leaves guy. Six months later, guy realizes he is ready, but instead of going back to see what’s up with girl A, he marries girl B. Why is that? That happens often and always makes me think it’s because there was just something about girl A he didn’t want, otherwise, why wouldn’t he try to go back to her?

Reply

61 Xquizzyt1 July 2, 2008 at 12:51 pm

See! That’s what I was saying. EXACTLY!!! That’s pretty much what I said below… before reading this comment.

Reply

62 Intellectual Hedonist July 2, 2008 at 1:00 pm

I was in a 14 year relationship with my high school sweetheart, the president of the “I ain’t ready for marriage, and I am not having children” club. He and I recently had this conversation (when he disclosed he was in an exclusive relationship) and I asked him if he was considering marrying his new gf, he paused and said no, then he said to me, if I were ever to get married I know that I would have to leave the country and probably enter into witness protection. I told him “You are damn right!”

Reply

63 soulfirelp July 2, 2008 at 1:03 pm

“if I were ever to get married I know that I would have to leave the country and probably enter into witness protection. I told him “You are damn right!”

LMBO!!!
now that’s real talk

Reply

64 ForReal July 2, 2008 at 1:11 pm

LOL!!!

Reply

65 Xquizzyt1 July 2, 2008 at 12:50 pm

Well, I agree with you there, that’s why I said “usually” and not “always.” =)

And I don’t know how old you are, but I’m almost 40, so I’m not talking about men who are 20-something – and still floundering around. My experience and observation is of men who “aren’t ready” merely because they aren’t sure about the chick they’ve been with, had kids with, etc. for the last 10 years… men are “not ready” right up until they meet a woman that makes the lightbulb go off. While I’m not saying that timing has nothing to do with it, I definitely think it has to do with the person too, because in my scenario, it’s not like the light bulb goes off and he goes back to his children’s mother that he was living with for 15 years and says, “Hey, I’m ready now, the lightbulb went off,” he marries new chick. And that’s what I’m talking about.

Reply

66 The Champ July 2, 2008 at 2:08 pm

you know, i’ll concede this point. i guess my original point was just that sometimes the cliche “its not you, its me” is actually true.

i’ll be 30 this year, btw.

Reply

67 puff July 2, 2008 at 6:10 am

i disagree with the whole “women are emotional creatures” argument. this was a problem i had with a dude, who assumed i wanted him to be my boyfriend cos we’d hooked up, while letting me know he didn’t want a girlfriend. not the case at all… it wasn’t that good. i don’t see an attractive man and automatically start wondering what suburb we’ll live in, what car(s) we’ll drive (had better be in the plural, motherfucker) or what our kids will look like. i think my age and where i am in my life right now controls the way i choose to/not to date, more than the fact that i am a woman. i was brought up by a very independent mother who is the least romantic person i know, and who enforced in me the idea of not depending on a man for everything, whether it’s money or your emotional well-being, which perhaps contributes to my skepticism on this issue. i don’t doubt that many women act like you say in this post, but the group you describe most definitely does not cover all women. some can separate the sex from emotion, just like some men are unable to do so. i’m not putting a value judgement on this issue, btw, i do not believe there is anything wrong with seeing someone you find attractive and imagining a future with them. i’m just saying it’s not all women. $.02

Reply

68 Elenda July 2, 2008 at 6:28 am

@Puff. I agree. I think your first thought when seeing someone attractive is aobut their ability to perform in the sheets. After they prove themselves there (during a courtship), then the house, car, kids, and life goals start taking over the brain.

Reply

69 willnotbetelevised July 2, 2008 at 8:57 am

See this is the reason I argue with men who think women are made of butterflies, feathers and honey. Because some honestly think its inherent and genetic. Unlike our wise pjack who recognizes the socialization. But all the guys who try to pull the inherent argument on me are the most romantic sappy fools I know. And all the women I know are cold, heartless and hardcore in comparison. No we don’t like holding hands, I would prefer not to pick out pet names for each other-I can call you by your given, if you bring up babies I’m running for the hills, my last name next to yours, what the fricknfrack is wrong with you type of women. But mebbe I’m unique or off-topic.

Reply

70 The Champ July 2, 2008 at 10:36 am

“See this is the reason I argue with men who think women are made of butterflies, feathers and honey”

so you’re not????

Reply

71 willnotbetelevised July 2, 2008 at 12:19 pm

Nope sorry to disappoint but there are many more ingredients to this woman. Honey is one, feathers unfortunately not, butterflies only before public speaking.

Reply

72 Xquizzyt1 July 2, 2008 at 12:58 pm

ROFLMAO!!! Love the butterfly comment.

Reply

73 Miss Patterson July 2, 2008 at 9:53 am

“i do not believe there is anything wrong with seeing someone you find attractive and imagining a future with them. i’m just saying it’s not all women.”

Good point, there are so many subtle (& distinct) varieties to us ladies, and yet i think most of the opposite sex thinks we are built the same with regards to our emotions. As a woman, it’s even hard for me to swallow the idea that every woman doesn’t think like me (lol!) i’d like to believe we’re all hopeless romantics. Then again, maybe you can be my voice of reason. i’m blabbing now.

Reply

74 GOODENess July 2, 2008 at 3:34 pm

“there are so many subtle (& distinct) varieties to us ladies, and yet i think most of the opposite sex thinks we are built the same with regards to our emotions. ”

very true…but…unfortunately…I think we (women) are guilty of this same idiosyncrysy where men are concerned…none of can be painted with the same brush…

I agree with you n this…but I wanted to point that out…

Reply

75 Miss Patterson July 2, 2008 at 7:35 pm

“I think we (women) are guilty of this same idiosyncrasy where men are concerned…none of can be painted with the same brush…”

Ah man, you mean i CAN’T make generalizations about men? That’s no fun.

Reply

76 genius khan July 2, 2008 at 10:01 am

Puff i don’t think P was saying that ALL women are this way. we know there are exceptions.

For the most part we believe that MOST women are more prone to emotional influence (versus men) in the area of love dating and relationship and want to commit much faster than men. if you disagree on this let me know and if you do please substantiate.

i’m just trying to understand. help us out.

Reply

77 puff July 2, 2008 at 10:56 am

@ genius

i don’t disagree that mos women seem prone to the emotional influence. this has a lot to do, as was mentioned before, with our social conditioning: we are told to look for a “prince charming,” “save ourselves for mr. right” and all that good shit. men, on the other hand, are allowed to do pretty much whatever what they want when they’re young until they decide it’s time for them to grow up and settle down. even so, it’s always implicitly suggested (at least, in my experience and most definitely from my culture) that a woman should look for a man who can take care of her financial – essentially where daddy left off. a man, on the other hand, should look for a woman who can cook/clean/provide offspring. this is what society has traditionally demanded. the fact that women wanting sex in a similar way to men i.e. out of pure physicality has been basically made to seem like an impossibilty annoys me because it’s simply not true. sex is a biological function, but it seems to me that social conditioning is what makes people think that men and women see it differently. i apologise for sounding rather simone de beauvoir-esque, and have to reinforce that i’m only 20 and in college – a long-term boyfriend or marriage are ridiculously far off my radar. i want to have fun and focus on my career first. i don’t think that’s anything determined by gender, but that’s just me. i hope some of my rambling made sense… :s

Reply

78 genius khan July 2, 2008 at 12:09 pm

i feel ya now Puff. yeah it’s a double standard on how men and women are viewed as it relates to sex. …and we can say that it’s unfair but shit a whole lot of life is unfair. (double standards abound) it’s up to you to seek wisdom and decide for yourself what accepted standards apply and what is just a jedi mindtrick. be safe, be respectful, do u.

Reply

79 Elenda July 2, 2008 at 6:14 am

As a woman, I did not start dating looking for a husband. In my mind I didn’t even want to get married until I was at least 25. However, I was in search for the qualities of a husband while learning my body and about life in general. Hell, I was just having good ole fun just like males, but I did have a goal.

I started dating at 14/15 and it was for practice. My health teacher and coach Mr. Rogers said something to our class in the 9th grade that I took to heart “dating is nothing but a practice run for marriage. When you get to the point when you decide to get married, you need to select the mate who satisfys most of your needs and will treat you right.”

Women are conditionalized to settle donwn. It is a familiar and comfortable place- safe. Jumping from bed to bed with no mental stimulation gets old and women are wise enough to realize that there is much more to life than sex.

I agree women are better people and women at this point (adulthood) are dating to get married or develop prospects. You can pounce on warm and fuzzy things your entire life but like smoking a joint, are you getting any higher? Besides getting a$$, what is the man’s purpose for dating? Seriously, a$$ cannot motivate and hold ones attention that long especially when it is so easy to attain. Men just don’t have goals when it comes to dating. They are just going through the motions.

Reply

80 Mikki July 2, 2008 at 8:00 am

“like smoking a joint, are you getting any higher?”

Tshirt for the day

Reply

81 genius khan July 2, 2008 at 12:04 pm

“like smoking a joint, are you getting any higher?”

naw, naw but i could be increasing the length of the flight. thats why they have in flight re-fueling. ahhhhh ha ha ha ha ha.

fasten your seatbelt and remain seated until the…..

Reply

82 genius khan July 2, 2008 at 10:05 am

E sighs: “Men just don’t have goals when it comes to dating.”

P-Jack said it best: “men date until they are ready to get married, women are ready to get married [settle, commit] and so they date.

choice is based on awareness so get out there see what you don’t like and like, see what’s available. you would should do that with a career, car, house etc. it’s even more importatnt for a commited relationship right? i’m not saying you have to whore anymore than you want to but choice is based on awareness.

Reply

83 Elenda July 2, 2008 at 10:43 am

@GK. “choice is based on awareness so get out there see what you don’t like and like, see what’s available. you would should do that with a career, car, house etc. it’s even more importatnt for a commited relationship right”

Once you find what you are looking for, stop looking!

Reply

84 genius khan July 2, 2008 at 12:00 pm

Elenda emphatically retorts: “Once you find what you are looking for, stop looking!”

well, if what you mean by “…stop looking” is to don’t date anyone else and or get married then i’d say:

choosing to be commited or married is about more than finding what you’re looking for [in a woman]. it has also to do with timing, other circumstances etc. but i’m sure you already know this huh?

more to it than that luv….

Reply

85 jess July 2, 2008 at 11:15 am

isnt this post about how men and women differ on perspective? I mean.. if a man’s offering his perspective on HIS own actions.. who are we to say that they’re wrong.. when women offer perspectives on OUR actions… they can’t say shit either. Its comparing apples and oranges, isnt it?

I dont know if im following a “male” mentality (I have to agree with what was said earlier.. we’re all the same inside, somewhat) but I have turned down GREAT prospects for committment just because I wasn’t ready. I can’t love wholly until my soul feels like it’s ready to sacrifice itself to let someone else completely in. It’s just not ready, I haven’t done enough, I haven’t won enough, I haven’t fallen enough and I just have too much to learn. I can only hope that those I let go come back when my mind&heart’s right, but love is NOT a matter of choice..

Reply

86 GOODENess July 2, 2008 at 3:39 pm

“choice is based on awareness so get out there see what you don’t like and like, see what’s available. you would should do that with a career, car, house etc. it’s even more importatnt for a commited relationship right? ”

***them church mimes that act out gospel music and ish***

Reply

87 The Champ July 2, 2008 at 10:42 am

“Men just don’t have goals when it comes to dating. They are just going through the motions.”

i vehemently disagree. i disagree so much so, that i’ll direct you to a 500 word entry written on this site that expresses the opposite viewpoint:

http://www.verysmartbrothas.com/the-expectation-factor/

Reply

88 Elenda July 2, 2008 at 10:47 am

@Champ. Just because the spend money, initiate, or expect sex does not mean they are dating with a purpose (sigh)

Reply

89 The Champ July 2, 2008 at 2:10 pm

“@Champ. Just because the spend money, initiate, or expect sex does not mean they are dating with a purpose (sigh)”

sex is a purpose though, lol.

Reply

90 Miss Patterson July 2, 2008 at 3:20 pm

oh brother…i mean brotha.

Reply

91 GOODENess July 2, 2008 at 3:40 pm

TOUCHE!

Reply

92 utc115 July 2, 2008 at 1:58 pm

“Men just don’t have goals when it comes to dating. They are just going through the motions.”

I agree with this statement a little.

So we have the understanding that some men we are dating do have goals. Some are dating us and pretending to be interested just for a good fuck and that is their goal too.

I just believe that alot of men are out here for the sex. Everybody has a list or idea of the mate that they would choice if God put a good selection before them. So why do we have to go through 10 to 30 people to find the mate that we want to be with. Someone told me once that you should have a good idea after 2 weeks if u are interested in someone. But are we really dating or laying around screwing. I didnt say you would know everything about them but somethings you pick up on and then its time to move on.

I blame each individual person for what happens to them. You had plenty of signs that told you to let that one go and move on but you decided to stay and thats when it points to a woman being needy and emotional because we try to MAKE IT WORK…………………………

Reply

93 Mikki July 2, 2008 at 8:02 am

I for one can’t separate sex from emotion, can we get a poll??????

Reply

94 miss t-lee July 2, 2008 at 8:56 am

I can. :)
Like I’ve stated in earlier posts. You have to know what type of woman you are.
Either you can, or you can’t. Saves yourself a lot of heartache if you know for sure which one you are.

Reply

95 Mikki July 2, 2008 at 9:02 am

Your exactly right you have to know which you are, and stick with it. I know to many who claim they can separate the two yet chasing after the very man they say they only want sex from trying to find out why they don’t love them.

After I realized I was the one who couldn’t separate the two I changed my behavior thus far its saving me a ton of head ache and heart ache just as you stated

Reply

96 D*Boy- D*Stroy July 2, 2008 at 9:30 am

I think the question should be: Do you WANT to seperate emotion from sex?

Reply

97 Elenda July 2, 2008 at 9:31 am

@D*Stroy. “Do you WANT to seperate emotion from sex?” Nope sex is better with with the one you love.

Reply

98 D*Boy- D*Stroy July 2, 2008 at 9:32 am

Agreed!

Reply

99 The Champ July 2, 2008 at 10:44 am

“@D*Stroy. “Do you WANT to seperate emotion from sex?” Nope sex is better with with the one you love.”

its better, true…

…but it still can be pretty good with the one you “kind of like on tuesdays”

Reply

100 puff July 2, 2008 at 10:58 am

its better, true…

…but it still can be pretty good with the one you “kind of like on tuesdays”

haha, i concur.

Reply

101 GOODENess July 2, 2008 at 3:41 pm

between 11pm and 2.15am…LOL

Reply

102 Mikki July 2, 2008 at 9:35 am

No D I don’t. I think sex is the most loving act you can have between a man and a woman to separate the two is blaspheme to me. I mean how can you just wake up next to someone your just “feeling” that would hurt my heart every time and it has in the past hurt my heart so now I just take sex completely out of the equation until I know that I am with a person that loves me just like the love i am willing to express in my sexual acts. I never have and never will have sex just to Satisfy my urge its just not in my make-up.

Reply

103 jess July 2, 2008 at 11:22 am

thats why you dont wake up next to them ;)

Reply

104 miss t-lee July 2, 2008 at 11:42 am

@ jess…you typed this before I could.
I spends the night though…we visited this in an earlier post. LOL

Reply

105 Mikki July 2, 2008 at 12:46 pm

lmao I just saw that comment

*fell out my chair*

Reply

106 soulfirelp July 2, 2008 at 12:51 pm

me either mikki

I have learned that I can’t help but get involved totally. People say u can seperate the two and im sure u can….but I don’t want to! feelings and sex were meant to b attached to me

Reply

107 miss t-lee July 2, 2008 at 9:37 am

We all know it’s better when actual love is involved. I’m just saying don’t fool yourself into thinking you can separate the two if you aren’t able to do so.
There are plenty men out there who can’t separate the two as well.

Reply

108 Mikki July 2, 2008 at 9:40 am

exactly my point

Reply

109 D*Boy- D*Stroy July 2, 2008 at 9:51 am

Don’t say “we all know” ’cause I know far too many dogs out there who are solely into sex for the pursuit and conquest. They put no value on the act….it’s all about how hot the girl is and what they were able to coax her into doing within the first day (or week) of meeting. it’s pretty pathetic actually.

Reply

110 D*Boy- D*Stroy July 2, 2008 at 9:59 am

Matter o’ fact…I was one of those n*ggas!!!!

Reply

111 miss t-lee July 2, 2008 at 10:02 am

The “we all kow” is pertaining to the people who are currently discussing this subject.
Not all of humanity.

Reply

112 D*Boy- D*Stroy July 2, 2008 at 10:05 am

lol…I assumed as much… I was just using your language as a springboard for my point. It came out wrong though (more confrontational than intended)…my bad.

Reply

113 miss t-lee July 2, 2008 at 10:10 am

You’re good D-Stroy.
You were just trying to get your point across, as was I.
Truce? :)

Reply

114 D*Boy- D*Stroy July 2, 2008 at 10:45 am

Truce! ;-)

Reply

115 Miss Patterson July 2, 2008 at 10:01 am

good question. and no, i’d prefer not to.

Reply

116 jess July 2, 2008 at 11:20 am

speaking from the perspective of someone who has separated the two, I have to stand up for it. It’s not the healthiest, but depending on your mindnset, it can be great. You can’t go into a lovership with a relationship mentality, because youll end up confused, yearning, and bitter b/c you fall short. However, when handled with the right amount of respect from both parties, loverships are intensely and mutually satisfying.

Reply

117 Mikki July 2, 2008 at 12:49 pm

You are 100% right on this some people can do it and I WISH i was one of em, If I had been i might notta tried to run that old lady off the road yesterday…

joke joke

Reply

118 Elenda July 2, 2008 at 9:30 am

@Mikki. I can separate sex from love and emotions as well.

Reply

119 The Comeback Girl July 2, 2008 at 9:39 am

I don’t think it can REALLY be done esp. if the woman is committment minded. Most of it had to do with the lies the feminists tried to tell each other…and you see what happen to Gloria Steinam (sp??)…her butt went and got MARRIED.

Reply

120 K. July 2, 2008 at 9:41 am

I don’t think so either. A woman will SAY “it’s just sex” but a minute later she’s analyzing some shyt he did/said or didn’t do/say.

Reply

121 V Renee July 2, 2008 at 10:02 am

I definitely think it’s possible to separate the two. Like ms. t-lee stated, some can and some can’t. I think that when women say it’s not possible, it means it’s not possible FOR THEM (and maybe a few other friends/associates they know). In my younger days (quite possibly meaning yesterday), I’ve had sex just for the pleasures derived from it….there was NO desire for a relationship, nor was there any type of analyzing of what he said, how he said or all the other hoopla. I think part of it depends on your stage of life. At the time I was in college, and did not want a boyfriend or SO. My primary focus was “kicking it” with a little schoolwork on the side.

Now at this point in my life (maybe) without strings attached is not an option (partly because of some guy we’ll call my boyfriend). But it’s DEF possible to play hide the sausage and not want anything else.

Reply

122 K. July 2, 2008 at 10:20 am

I still think it’s just phony “I can f&ck like a man” tough talk. A lot of times when the woman doesn’t want to be in a relationship w/ the guy she’s “just f&cking” there’s a reason – either he’s mediocre or some other obstacle is in the way. No woman is gonna meet a great guy and say, “you know what, I think I wanna JUST f&ck him.” I just don’t believe it.

Reply

123 The Comeback Girl July 2, 2008 at 10:36 am

Me neither. Sure all women don’t want to be married. But its safe to say MOST on a deep level want a person to be committed and devoted to JUST THEM. You can’t get that with a random warm body, and really why would you???

I don’t care what NOBODY SAYS. SEX seeks to forge a spiritual connection (that real love making inherently does). I don’t want no random spirits up in me…the wrong ones are too hard to get rid of as it is.

Reply

124 southernabelle July 2, 2008 at 4:06 pm

Right… you don’t JUST bone great guys…you try to drop the hammer on they aZZ! Come on ladies… 9 times outta 10 if you can split the two- sex ad Love (myself included ) you are not going all out on Ray-Ray…you buss and you out – he has nothing that even smells like husband about him…so you are not day dreaming about a life with him- a nut-but- not a life..BUT if you come across a guy who you feel is worth dreaming about –you do…that has been the case for me anyway…

Reply

125 D*Boy- D*Stroy July 2, 2008 at 10:37 am

I think this is why people should wait to have s*x until they have a better understanding of the life in general. Your college example brings to mind news stories of children in elementary school who are caught experimenting with s*x. Not to say that your example and mine are exactly the same but I am quite sure that those children separated the emotional aspect from the physical. Point is, college (not unlike elementary school) is a highly developmental time (teens to early twenties)…you are expected to act immaturely and without prudence…why should your understandings of sexual behavior be any more evolved.

Reply

126 Intellectual Hedonist July 2, 2008 at 4:30 pm

@ D*Boy-D*Stroy what’s with the name change?

Reply

127 D*Boy- D*Stroy July 2, 2008 at 4:36 pm

Gubmint was trying to get a little too close…so I had to switch up on dat @ss! you feel me.

Reply

128 Intellectual Hedonist July 2, 2008 at 4:55 pm

I do feel you (and it feels good..sorry)

fa’ real I changed mine three times since the vsb launch ;)

gobm’nt is no joke

Reply

129 The Comeback Girl July 2, 2008 at 10:53 am

“But it’s DEF possible to play hide the sausage and not want anything else.”

***Clark Sisters SANGIN “Is My Living In Vain” ***

Reply

130 miss t-lee July 2, 2008 at 9:47 am

I’m sorry. I don’t know ish about the feminism movement.
Some women are not commitment minded. It’s not everyone’s dream to have a husband and the white picket fence.
Not saying that’s the case with me, but I realize we as women do not all want the same thing.

Reply

131 The Comeback Girl July 2, 2008 at 9:53 am

Most women who tried to co-sign with seperating love and sex didn’t know anything about the feminist movement either. They thought they were just being sexually free.

But sex comes with an emotional price. It always did and always will.

Reply

132 D*Boy- D*Stroy July 2, 2008 at 9:58 am

“sex comes with an emotional price. It always did and always will.”

Realest sh*t you ever wrote!

Reply

133 The Comeback Girl July 2, 2008 at 10:26 am

Why thanks D..

Reply

134 Cheryl July 2, 2008 at 9:49 am

I can separate sex and emotion.

Women have sexual urges just like men do. Sometimes I feel like a nut, not a damn hug.

Reply

135 miss t-lee July 2, 2008 at 9:51 am

@ Cheryl

*Friends and Family Day Service*

Reply

136 D*Boy- D*Stroy July 2, 2008 at 9:56 am

I don’t think that anyone is saying that they always wnat to make love or get “a damn hug”. I think that we are simply saying that the person with whom you have sex should be someone you love…otherwise you could just “handle your business” by your lonesome and call it a day.

Ultimately, I think that if you want to engage in s*x with someone who you don’t really care about you must be looking for something more than just a n*t. And that should be thoroughly analyzed because there are faster more convenient ways to accomplish that.

Reply

137 V Renee July 2, 2008 at 10:06 am

Who said you didn’t have to care about the person? You can care, but not desire a relationship. I think people take their feelings regarding sex and whom you should have it with, when, for how long and think that the way they feel is the way everyone else does……not so much

Reply

138 miss t-lee July 2, 2008 at 10:11 am

V Renee…

yes!!!

Reply

139 D*Boy- D*Stroy July 2, 2008 at 10:21 am

V Renee,

“You can care, but not desire a relationship.”

That is a super-interesting and intriguing point. Raises the question: How do you care enough to sleep with someone but not enough to open yourself up to them for the purpose of a relationship?

“I think people take their feelings regarding sex and whom you should have it with, when, for how long and think that the way they feel is the way everyone else does……not so much”

I thought it was understood that these are solely my opinions. If I came across as judgemental it was definitely not my intent particularly because I used to be a guy who separated emotion from intimacy–which would make me a hypocrite. I am not judging anyone else, just simply saying that it doesn’t follow logically that a person be promiscuous for the sole purpose of fulfilling a physical need… because that same physical need can be fulfilled without a partner. I am also saying that a person must be looking for something in addition to the “n*t” whether it be momentary companionship, an attempt at free-spiritedness, etc.
I am not assigning a moral value on the act one way or the other… just saying that intuitively it would seem there is more driving the act.

Reply

140 Mikki July 2, 2008 at 10:25 am

Well said

Reply

141 The Comeback Girl July 2, 2008 at 10:29 am

“just saying that intuitively it would seem there is more driving the act”

Now why you got to go and bring intuition in all this….

but since you did, all signs could point to seeking to self-protect maintaining control to not be hurt. Its a valid feeling.

Reply

142 V Renee July 2, 2008 at 11:16 am

D- In no way did I think that you were being judgemental at all. I was just speaking in general to the belief that women can’t have sex without wanting more.

As for the caring but not wanting a relationship – just because you don’t want a relationship doesn’t mean that you don’t care about them. One doesn’t necessary want to be with everyone they deem attractive. I guess in some cases it could be a friends with benefits scenario. You care about the person but don’t want to be with them for various reasons. It doesn’t mean you don’t want to fuck.

I know that you can always get a “nut” by yourself, but dammit that doesn’t replace the feeling of a real physical body.

Reply

143 miss t-lee July 2, 2008 at 11:36 am

Getting a knutt by yourself, doesn’t get it done. I’m sorry. There is no subsitute.

Reply

144 The Comeback Girl July 2, 2008 at 11:41 am

I’m not trying to be graphic but how the hell does a woman “bust a nut”. I don’t have pen$s envy. Im perfectly fine with my nice vagina and its notion of arousal, gspot and climax.

and the idea is to NOT do it alone. If you’re making good decisions your ENSURING THAT YOU WON”T HAVE TO.

Reply

145 The Champ July 2, 2008 at 2:12 pm

“I’m not trying to be graphic but how the hell does a woman “bust a nut”. ”

**debating whether or not to link comeback girl to a clip of a female squirting orgasm**

Reply

146 miss t-lee July 2, 2008 at 2:25 pm

**debating whether or not to link comeback girl to a clip of a female squirting orgasm**

better you than I Champ.

Reply

147 The Comeback Girl July 2, 2008 at 3:12 pm

“**debating whether or not to link comeback girl to a clip of a female squirting orgasm**”

that was a rhetorical question. I know the whole “bust it baby” phenom now has young girls wishing they had pen$ses but I didn’t think those were grown women. My issue is the ways in which a grown azz woman describes her sexual peak in the same context of a man. YOU ARE NOT A MAN.

Pen$s envy lives on…Freud aint NEVA lied.

Reply

148 Cheryl July 2, 2008 at 11:36 am

I don’t know how “handling it yourself” feels for men – but for a woman, specifically me, the nut I get from “handling it myself” and the nut I get from having it handled for me is 2 different kindsa nuts.

I’m not opposed to self-handling, but the shit gets old. Sometimes I just want to be man-handled.

and like some else commented, who said I didn’t have to care about them? Not wanting to be in a relationship with them (or anyone else) doesn’t mean I don’t care about them as a person. That is the key difference (for me) in f*ck buddy vs. FWB.

Reply

149 genius khan July 2, 2008 at 11:43 am

Cheryl coins: Sex, I can handle myself but sometimes i wanna be manhandled.

i’ll handle the shit out of woman too. heh, heh, heh…. LOL!

bumpersticker!

i ain’t mad atya Cheryl. touch urself until somebodyelse can do it for you.

Reply

150 miss t-lee July 2, 2008 at 11:45 am

“I don’t know how “handling it yourself” feels for men – but for a woman, specifically me, the nut I get from “handling it myself” and the nut I get from having it handled for me is 2 different kindsa nuts.”

You are correct ma’am.

Reply

151 Cheryl July 2, 2008 at 11:51 am

Who says the person I have sex with should be someone I love? You? Them? *points finger to the rest of the world*

In my almost 35 years on this rotating rock I have seen things and experienced things and dealt with things that not only show me, but brought it home with massive conviction that my time here is limited. I won’t waste my limited years living my life to fit someone else’s moral code, values system or beliefs.

I pick and choose the who what when where how i share my body, I don’t let someone else make that decision for me.

Reply

152 D*Boy- D*Stroy July 2, 2008 at 3:06 pm

Cheryl,

The (my) comment that you responded to included the following statement:

“I am not assigning a moral value on the act one way or the other… just saying that intuitively it would seem there is more driving the act.”

The entire third paragraph was constructed to speak to this point…so, take it easy noone is asking you to conform to anyone “else’s moral code, values system or beliefs.” I was making an assertion that people’s decisions regarding sexual partners is generally motivated by more than just physical pleasure. Not sure how else I can clarify this point…

Reply

153 Cheryl July 2, 2008 at 3:14 pm

I’m sorry hun – I either hit reply in the wrong place or something but this is what I was replying to:

“D*Boy- D*Stroy {July 2, 2008 at 9:56 am}

I don’t think that anyone is saying that they always wnat to make love or get “a damn hug”. I think that we are simply saying that the person with whom you have sex should be someone you love…otherwise you could just “handle your business” by your lonesome and call it a day.

Ultimately, I think that if you want to engage in s*x with someone who you don’t really care about you must be looking for something more than just a n*t. And that should be thoroughly analyzed because there are faster more convenient ways to accomplish that.”

im not worked up or anything. but when i responded you hadnt yet made (or i hadnt yet read) what you thought i was commenting on.

my bad.

Reply

154 D*Boy- D*Stroy July 2, 2008 at 3:20 pm

Awwe man…now I feel like a prick. Thanks for the clarification. Perhaps I’m the one who should take it easy. The bad is mine… My bad. ;-)

**extending my hand so we can frollick off into the sunset as friends**

Reply

155 genius khan July 2, 2008 at 10:31 am

I agree Cheryl and Comeback 99% of the time you can’t seperate emotion from sex and therefore having sex cums with an emotionl price. (other prices too physical and metaphysical etc. but that’s besides the point)

i think what people are really trying to describe is how some PEOPLE (more men) can seperate the act of sex from intimacy.

some people can have sex and afterwards DETACH from this close aquaintance in a manner that is marked by informality and privacy.

intimate: Marked by close acquaintance, association, or familiarity.

emotion: The part of the consciousness that involves feeling.

i don’t think anybody is going to argue that sex is seperated from feeling. hell thats the purpose in most cases. to derive a feeling. satisfaction etc.

exception: being repeatedly raped you may become desensitized.

Reply

156 The Comeback Girl July 2, 2008 at 10:41 am

“being repeatedly raped you may become desensitized.”

And that essentially is what men are able to do (minus the rape) its so indoctrinated in who they are and what defines them as men…they can easily do it MOST TIMES..I totally agree. I’m arguing that women can’t everything sexual about us in ON THE INSIDE.

I’m not condoning men going out and screwing every Sally and Jane…but our job as women is to elevate our men.

Reply

157 D*Boy- D*Stroy July 2, 2008 at 10:42 am

Excellent point.

Reply

158 ForReal July 2, 2008 at 10:10 am

I can, but like D and some others have pointed out, I’d rather not have to.

Reply

159 Mikki July 2, 2008 at 10:19 am

I just don’t want to confuse the woman’s free style movement with love and emotions. I love sex just as much as the next man if not more and makes no bones about it BUT i also understand the concept of delayed gratification which makes all the difference. If i can wait to be with someone I LOVE and eventually want to spend my life with then its worth me not just getting my rocks off, just like D said they have tons of gizmoze and gagets for that if you NEED TO BUST A NUT so bad, I do it errr day!!!!

ok that was tmi

Reply

160 soulfirelp July 2, 2008 at 11:22 am

I can’t separate it Mikki

even when I tried my emotions showed up and knocked on the door.

It’s better when you’re mentally feeling the one you’re physically pleasing

Reply

161 Intellectual Hedonist July 2, 2008 at 11:39 am

I can separate the two, and at times have done so for self preservation.

Sex is a BASIC need, its actually one of the primary basic needs a human being requires along with breathing, food, and water; according to Maslow (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maslow%27s_hierarchy_of_needs). Love is a basic need however is at at higher stage of development (social acceptance).

Is sex better when you are with the one you love? Most definitely! Been there done that, currently looking for the next true love of my life, but until then, I guard my heart and get my physical needs met, and we are all happier because of it, TRUST ME!

Like the old song goes when you cant be with the one you love f*ck the one you’re with (its the remix)

Reply

162 Mikki July 2, 2008 at 11:45 am

when you cant be with the one you love f*ck the one you’re with (its the remix)

T-shirt anyone???

Seriously I don’t buy into all that NEED sex to servive, sure you NEED sex but I can control my emotions to where if im not getting it im not going off and cussing out everyone that comes in my path. would i be happier?? yes and no because some of the drama that comes with it aint worth it

and i dont care what book or study says I will survive without sex its not like drinking water or food come on now!!!

Reply

163 Cheryl July 2, 2008 at 12:00 pm

I think sex as a need varies person to person.

I know women who don’t care if they ever have sex again in life. I’m totally dumbfounded by this. I mean totally. I cry for those women.

I could NOT imagine never having sex again. The world could not handle me abstinent forever. Abstinent in stints, but not forever. Hormones reach felonious levels … and I mean that actually.

Reply

164 The Champ July 2, 2008 at 2:17 pm

“Hormones reach felonious levels”

……..

Reply

165 miss t-lee July 2, 2008 at 2:27 pm

“I know women who don’t care if they ever have sex again in life. I’m totally dumbfounded by this. I mean totally. I cry for those women. ”

It’s been more than half a year for me Cheryl, and trust and believe I’m about to kill someone.

Reply

166 Mikki July 2, 2008 at 2:33 pm

I am pushing 1 year and its safe to say i dont want to kill anyone yet, but i cant predict what i may be thinkin in the next oh say 24 hours, that might change lol

Reply

167 Cheryl July 2, 2008 at 2:35 pm

its been 6 weeks and I have already assaulted a chick at dunkin donuts last week.

felonious hormone levels.

Reply

168 Intellectual Hedonist July 2, 2008 at 12:18 pm

but that is exactly what Maslow contends its because you are at a higher development stage where you are able to control your emotions and such.

Reply

169 miss t-lee July 2, 2008 at 11:55 am

“Like the old song goes when you cant be with the one you love f*ck the one you’re with (its the remix)”

This is a helluva remix. LOL
Can I get a MP3? :)

Reply

170 utc115 July 2, 2008 at 2:01 pm

I think my emotions are waaaay off and sex has nothing to do with it. I can go for a while without (now its been 6 months) so…………………………..its my emotions. I like/love hard.

Reply

171 GOODENess July 2, 2008 at 3:42 pm

I CAN but I look forward to the day that I don’t have to….

Reply

172 The Comeback Girl July 2, 2008 at 8:23 am

Im mad that we are trying to intellecutalize why men are sexual beings (whores). Men are primarily sexual beings. I think ultimately men unconsiously are looking for a woman to raise the spiritual standard. Do we get offended when a man signals sutble sexual interest on a first date ? To me isn’t that part of the courtship requirement, to be sexually attracted??

Its what we as women DO with the information. If you know that men use love to get sex…then the logical thing to do is not sleep with him on date 3 after he says “I love you”. If you are actually LOOKING FOR LOVE. Now if you just want sex ..”love away”.

Women use sex to get love. To me its all about negotiation. Dating is about getting to know a man anyway. Im not proud to say that I consumated a relationship with man I discovered I didn’t EVEN LIKE a year later. I would have discovered the shi%t sooner if I had of not clouded it with romatiized notions of what sex does in the early stages of courtship.

Reply

173 D*Boy- D*Stroy July 2, 2008 at 10:01 am

This is some smart sh*t! Great comment.

Reply

174 genius khan July 2, 2008 at 10:39 am

Comeback we are all whores [in one sense or another] just with different price tags.

whore: A person considered sexually promiscuous. A person considered as having compromised principles for personal gain.

promiscuous: Having casual sexual relations, sometimes with many different partners.

Reply

175 The Comeback Girl July 2, 2008 at 10:42 am

GK I agree. Its all about the exchange. Its value and what another is willing to pay.

For me …for sex…the price is too high right now.

Reply

176 Mikki July 2, 2008 at 12:36 pm

CAN I GET AN AMEN!!!

just because I said I have control over my emotions doesn’t change my sex drive at all I still am a freak all day and night. BUT what I do have control over is how I respond to my sexual drive which I guess came when I matured, its there but I just choose to suppress the urges or satisfy them “other ways” than having to need a man. But other reasons for that not just cuz i want love, its also because I don’t want to put up with a man who lies, a man who sleeps around, cheats and makes me feel like he is emotionally unavailable. Its something about that now that creeps me out. to wake up to a man I can’t see being with long term, or wake up thinking, “damn I wish he would hurry up n get out ma bed”. OR better yet to wonder if he sees me as long term or some booty call while he is out trying to find the true love of his life and im just his hit and quit or vs versa for that matter. ALL in the name of getting my rocks off!! Now really to eaches own but I am to much of a emotional person to just let sex fly I put my all into that act and i will be damn if somebody who “just gets me off” has that pleasure of having my “Goodies”. I used to think that but now i dont charge it to the game of getting older

*singing my goodies*

Reply

177 D*Boy- D*Stroy July 2, 2008 at 10:44 am

It’s amazing how definitions can elevate a conversation. Good looking out GK, on that Webster-work!

Reply

178 Monk July 2, 2008 at 8:25 am

PD Jakes says: “Now of course, I tend to believe that at their core, women are better people than men.”

This makes me sad.

Reply

179 The Champ July 2, 2008 at 8:31 am

PD Jakes says: “Now of course, I tend to believe that at their core, women are better people than men.”

This makes me sad.

i believe the same thing.

why does this make you sad?

Reply

180 willnotbetelevised July 2, 2008 at 8:45 am

Damnit PJack, are you calling me a man? Just because in my youth I only was looking for pretty faces and bodies and good dildo and not a relationship. because I thought hell I was young and only young once. Or are you calling me a whore? Whatever you’re calling me I don’t like your tone. I demand an apology.

;)

Reply

181 Monk July 2, 2008 at 8:48 am

PD Jakes says: “Now of course, I tend to believe that at their core, women are better people than men.”This makes me sad.i believe the same thing. why does this make you sad?

This makes me sad because I don’t subscribe to the “women are better people” idea. I think it’s a huge misconception and dudes tend to give some women more credit than they deserve based on that theory. It saddens me because dudes are treating females like queens/princesses and reciprocity is no where in the equation. I almost feel like we’ve (men) has been conditioned to feel this way and it’s SO. NOT. TRUE.

Reply

182 miss t-lee July 2, 2008 at 9:00 am

“I think it’s a huge misconception and dudes tend to give some women more credit than they deserve based on that theory. It saddens me because dudes are treating females like queens/princesses and reciprocity is no where in the equation.”

I take it you weren’t feeling that Raheem DeVaughn “Woman” huh?
(j/k) don’t throw a knife a me. :)

Reply

183 willnotbetelevised July 2, 2008 at 9:13 am

Hmm being as you were not raised as a woman I can see the mistake. All I know is for black women we were raised to constantly forgive and help black men no matter what which I consider reciprocity. We were raised to treat black men as if all of them are better deep inside, we just have to put in the backbreaking work to dig, find it, and polish it up. However I also don’t like the idea that ALL women are better at their core because I swear it makes some men jump up and defend bitches when bitches have gone to far and need their comeuppance. Theres nothing deep down inside but more bitchery. She’s a bitch, can’t you just see that, she doesn’t get extra points because she has a vagina.

I, however, am a queen and better than most men and thus deserve such treatment from my king.

Reply

184 ForReal July 2, 2008 at 9:37 am

“We were raised to treat black men as if all of them are better deep inside, we just have to put in the backbreaking work to dig, find it, and polish it up. ”

Ain’t that the truth? Some people, men and women, are just fucked up, on the surface and deep inside, and we’d save oursevles a lot of time if we stopped trying to put lipstick on a pig.

Reply

185 K. July 2, 2008 at 9:34 am

“It saddens me because dudes are treating females like queens/princesses and reciprocity is no where in the equation.”

Do you have an example to share? I don’t see this shyt happening AT ALL!!!

Reply

186 Elenda July 2, 2008 at 9:51 am

@K. I need a damn example too. Last time I turned my TV to BET AKA the black channel, I didn’t see anybody being treated like Queens.

Reply

187 Deviant July 2, 2008 at 2:58 pm

Tv is the last place one should look for any type of positive example

Reply

188 GOODENess July 2, 2008 at 3:45 pm

***ran around the sanctuary screaming “JEEE-HO-VAAAAAH!!!”….then passed out with the HOLY GHOST…now on the ground sizzling like bacon***

Reply

189 The Comeback Girl July 2, 2008 at 9:49 am

Im more saddened when a man wants to be competitive about our specialness. And always wondering “who got next”.

A relationship is about negotiation of needs and wants. Is it manipulative maybe…but so are contracts. Quid Quo Pro all day every day.

The smart ones know how to give and take..without the man getting jealous and wanting to be the princess too.

Reply

190 genius khan July 2, 2008 at 10:49 am

Monk reports: “It saddens me because dudes are treating females like queens/princesses and reciprocity is no where in the equation. I almost feel like we’ve (men) has been conditioned to feel this way and it’s SO. NOT. TRUE.”

that’s that sense of entitlement for womenn that we have generally bought into. it seems like society teaches that men owe women something and if we get it right then we might deserve a scooby snack. fuc* outta here…..

HALLELUIAH!

Reply

191 GOODENess July 2, 2008 at 3:51 pm

at this…I am sad…I can’t save the world on my lunch break…damn!…when I am in the getting-to-know-a-brotha stage of conquest…ummm…I mean dating…I pay attention to what he says, does, thinks and feels because it opens the doors for me to do something sweet and thoughtful for him later…the smalledt acts, ya’ll…I try to BE what I WANT…and if you show people how to treat you…they will either get right or get left…I agree that sisters need to treat brothers like kings too (hell at least princes)…we wouldn’t be expected to stay in a dynamic where we weren’t appreciated…why should men?? I’m just saying!!!

(humming Black Brother by Angie Stone)

Reply

192 southernabelle July 2, 2008 at 4:23 pm

Amen… but on the flip Good some men don’t like to be treated “well” – why is it that men respond to bitches ?? …or as on ex told me ” men respond to strength ..” –so what do you want men ??

Reply

193 GOODENess July 2, 2008 at 4:40 pm

@southernbelle ~ not sure my little ring-a-ding…I am strong…and I have been told that I want to be the “man” in the “R” word…not so…but I have also been known to reply… “well, since I can articulate how I feel and you can’t…I must be the “man” in THIS “R” word..so kick rocks…” only not as nicely…

but I digress…

I think men that respond to b*tches aren’t the kind of man good girls like us want to be bothered with anyway…sounds like some self-depricating dom/sub issues laced with trace amounts of looking for a mommy…I already have a son…I need a man to nourish the woman side of me…not the mommy side…

Reply

194 southernabelle July 2, 2008 at 4:48 pm

tru dat

Reply

195 miss t-lee July 2, 2008 at 8:58 am

I remember reading somewhere that “women talk in circles, men talk in straight lines.”
The more I think about it—I’ve deemed this true.

Reply

196 willnotbetelevised July 2, 2008 at 9:06 am

women circle in on the truth and men just end up getting farther and farther away.

:) bitches love the smiley face

Reply

197 Suga&Spice July 2, 2008 at 9:17 am

I am definately the exception to this rule. It drives me nuts when men or women throw a shitload of unnecessary words into a conversation. That was one of the things that drove me crazy about my ex he talked in circles, but when I met his mother I understood why she talks the same way. By the time they got to their point my happy ass had tuned out. I kept thinking ‘Please, keep the bullshit I have no space for it.’

Reply

198 Mikki July 2, 2008 at 9:21 am

Omg!! I know a man who talked in circles and it made me hella crazy!!!!!!!

we arent together cuz he could never just get to the point. I mean I just asked you for a yes or no answer, not why the sky is blue!!!

Reply

199 miss t-lee July 2, 2008 at 9:23 am

^^^^ was his name Don Magic Juan?!
(I kid, I kid.)

Reply

200 Mikki July 2, 2008 at 9:27 am

Yes!!! that was his name!!! lmao!!

from Chicago do you know him??

lol

Reply

201 miss t-lee July 2, 2008 at 9:33 am

::snickering::

Reply

202 GOODENess July 2, 2008 at 3:56 pm

@SUGA…man I hate that ish…I love language…but use the ish correctly…to EXPRESS yourself…not just to hear yourelf talk as you throw out contradiction after lie after “ignit” shullbit filled comment!!!!

the truck runner used to do this…and it drove me crazy! all that talking and wasn’t saying SHIT!

it made me think that maybe folks feel like this about me (cuz I talk alot, too)…so I chill back on occasion…but then I was like nah…cuz I be saying shit and shit…LOL

Reply

203 Intellectual Hedonist July 2, 2008 at 4:06 pm

**shaking head** @ “the truck runner”, if he only knew that the name his mama gave him had been reduced to that. LMAO!!!

Reply

204 GOODENess July 2, 2008 at 4:45 pm

I was SO tempted to type his ENTIRE gubmint name up in here…I KNOW he doesn’t read blogs…lol..but if he ever googled himself…he would be out in my bushes, crying in the rain calling me to come outside and “talk” which is psycho code for “kill yo fine ass”…lol…so I am resisting the urge, but his initials are K.D.B…(looking over my shoulder and typing soft so the keys don’t click too loud)

Reply

205 Intellectual Hedonist July 2, 2008 at 5:17 pm

“but his initials are K.D.B”
LMAO~this made me laugh till tears rolled down my face!

Reply

206 Cheryl July 2, 2008 at 9:55 am

I talk in circles when I really don’t want to talk about whatever is being talked about, but I’m talking about it out of obligation.

Reply

207 genius khan July 2, 2008 at 10:55 am

Dam miss t-lee what an epiphany.

I remember reading somewhere that “women talk in circles, men talk in straight lines.”
The more I think about it—I’ve deemed this true.

salute!

Reply

208 Eb July 2, 2008 at 9:28 am

Times have change… Many of women like to let their soul glow now… its funny how times have changed and we have had to result to dating like men in order to remain sane. I look at my grandparents who married when they were 18 and stayed together the entire time and completely in love… having 6 kids, and not having a lavish life but they made it threw. I think many have a cynical view when it comes to dating now. Men dont want a woman that is independant, and yet when she’s not then she’s a golddigger… Women want a man that can take care of her… but puts him threw hell first to let him know that she doesnt “need” him to take care of her. Both sides need to just let go and let love… the problem is… age-wise, the male and female never realize this at the same time. The reason a lot of women have to date older men and not ones that are the same age who havent yet fathomed the concept of letting go and letting love.

Just my 2 cents from someone who has yet to find a man… and only looking for a summer love at the moment and not a commitment… so what do I know!

Reply

209 Elenda July 2, 2008 at 9:37 am

@Eb. Your 2 cents was worth a lot. I couldn’t agree with you more when it comes to dating someone older and ” let go and let love” is my goal in life.

I need a yellow t-shirt with that in pink writing please.

Reply

210 K. July 2, 2008 at 9:32 am

I’m always shocked that men can’t figure out why women seek relationships/marriage vs. random f&cking. It’s the way we’re socialized. A male child is encourage to “do his thing” while a female child is usually told to keep her legs closed, value her p&ssy, don’t “let” everybody in. I mean just look at the language we use — women “give it up” and men “hit, stab, poke, get some.” “Whore” and “ho” and “easy” are terms really only used to describe women who sleep around. So, I really don’t understand all this shockedness @ the differences in what men/women seek from the opposite sex!

Reply

211 miss t-lee July 2, 2008 at 9:58 am

Classic double standard.

Reply

212 The Comeback Girl July 2, 2008 at 10:44 am

So are most things in this world right down to the way income is made and distributed…its what you DO WITH THE INFORMATION.

Do you play it…or let it play you.

Reply

213 southernabelle July 2, 2008 at 4:29 pm

internally- women have clocks–men have compasses….we ( women) are always expecting….something..when we make our expectations known..men using their compass…go the other direction…
The key, I feel is to get our clocks and our compasses in sync…

Reply

214 Tyler July 2, 2008 at 9:35 am

Very interesting piece.

Seems to be you’ve worked yourself rhetorically to a place where you understand that patriarchy makes life ALOT easier for men than women…you just didn’t say it.

Reply

215 K. July 2, 2008 at 9:36 am

Ditto!!!

Reply

216 genius khan July 2, 2008 at 11:03 am

Tyler affirms: “…Seems to be you’ve worked yourself rhetorically to a place where you understand that patriarchy makes life ALOT easier for men than women”

in some ways i believe that patriarchy has made it easier on men (i.e. dating relationships, and how judged) but in a lot of ways patriarchy or whatever you deem as the cause certainly makes it harder for men. i guess you want me to make a list now huh? LOL!

talk black to me.

Reply

217 Tyler July 2, 2008 at 1:03 pm

I would agree with you. I think partiarchy makes different things harder for one gender over the other, but as most systems of domination it privileges (overall) one group more than the other.

Reply

218 soulfirelp July 2, 2008 at 10:28 am

I agree with you Panama!

We as women for the most part desire that man who will compliment our lives. That crazy thing is…I have guys friends who always say “men are simple” yet ya’ll come across complex at times. I guess it’s the whole not letting your feelings show. Things that make me go…hmmm:-/

The ladies were correct! Parents do play a major part in us holding on to the notion that our mate will find us! He’s out there! Although that mentality is seriously nerve racking at times, I still believe it to be true. In these days, I have to realize that men are raised differently. They want the same things for themselves just later down the line.

Reply

219 The Champ July 2, 2008 at 10:48 am

“That crazy thing is…I have guys friends who always say “men are simple” yet ya’ll come across complex at times. ”

lol…thats just ya’ll making us complex. we’re really not.

seriously

Reply

220 The Champ July 2, 2008 at 10:54 am

i think one factor that people aren’t taking into consideration here is biology. women are (generally speaking) typically more pressed to be in a committed relationship because, like it or not, they have a definite shrinking reproductive window. when you combine this with the toll that reproduction takes on a woman’s body, their different mindsets in regards to dating is completely understandable. frustrating, but understandable

subconsciously, this affects every thing a committment-minded woman does in regard to dating, relationships, etc. its not all about socialization. in fact, i’d even argue that socialization is just reinforcement of biological fact.

Reply

221 The Comeback Girl July 2, 2008 at 11:05 am

i’m not really sure I believe this anymore. Women are having children well into their 40s (without some of the risks that women had in their mid 30s).

I refuse to let my ovaries dictate my behavior and alter my good common sense and judgement.

Reply

222 The Champ July 2, 2008 at 11:13 am

“i’m not really sure I believe this anymore. Women are having children well into their 40s (without some of the risks that women had in their mid 30s).”

i want to believe you (at least in theory) but a couple decades of medical advancements aren’t gonna change thousands of years of evolution. plus, all the advancements mean is that the window stays cracked a little while longer. doesnt mean that its not there…and its not closing

Reply

223 The Comeback Girl July 2, 2008 at 11:21 am

“doesnt mean that its not there…and its not closing”

well WHAT YOU DON’T know is that I say a little prayer every night to my reproductive system. And that it won’t influence a bad decision.

And like steve harvey says “prayer changes THINGS”

And the oldest woman on record to concieve and give birth I believe is 60…so what does science say about a woman having a baby that should have been dead (100 years ago)

Reply

224 GOODENess July 2, 2008 at 4:00 pm

@COMEBACK…

I say a little prayer every night to my reproductive system…And like steve harvey says “prayer changes THINGS”

I swear!! I was trying so hard to hold in my sniggle-gigglery that I bit one of my tongue rings dammit! so sincere…and cute and shit…FUNNY STUFF!!!

Reply

225 The Comeback Girl July 2, 2008 at 4:20 pm

GOODENess

I’m taking any special Hail Mary requests tonight….Anyone???? Anyone????? I can pray for everybody’s uterus up until I run out rosary beads…

**that was my psa for the day***

Reply

226 GOODENess July 2, 2008 at 4:46 pm

(holding out right arm, like an usher) the doors of the church are open…is there one?

Reply

227 Leila July 2, 2008 at 12:35 pm

It’s true that women can have children at an older age, but I don’t think the majority of women want to. Most women that I know want to have children between 25-35, so that they’re not too old while the children are growing up.

Reply

228 Xquizzyt1 July 2, 2008 at 2:10 pm

@ The Comeback Girl –

To your comment that you refuse to let your ovaries dictate… all I can say to that is a resounding Amen. =)

Reply

229 soulfirelp July 2, 2008 at 11:05 am

so true!!!!

and it doesn’t help when family( and occasionally random peeps) ask if you’re dating seriously yet and then slide into the having kids conversation. The pressure for some can get crazy. Myself, i’m not ready for kids so I slide past that one.

Reply

230 Suga&Spice July 2, 2008 at 11:55 am

This conversation is the source of all evil between my mother and I.

Reply

231 soulfirelp July 2, 2008 at 12:53 pm

fortunately…my mother doesn’t go there often

the silence is blissful

Reply

232 genius khan July 2, 2008 at 11:13 am

yeah Champ i gave a shout to the womans biological clock as a major influence for their attitude towards dating. i’m sure it was hard to pick out of that treatise i delivered. (dam i went long, my bust) i understand the bio fact fully but how is it a mans fault for dating the way he does minus the biological pressure?

there is still room for the other issues surrounding the socialized and otherwise, different approaches to dating betwinxt male and female and our understanding of whats good and bad considering.

now let’s get it in…

Reply

233 The Champ July 2, 2008 at 11:56 am

“but how is it a mans fault for dating the way he does minus the biological pressure? ‘

its not. “i yam what i yam”

Reply

234 southernabelle July 2, 2008 at 4:32 pm

Clock vs. compass

Reply

235 soulfirelp July 2, 2008 at 10:56 am

@The Champ

I hear ya

that’s why my “work in progress” is to learn to chill out

Reply

236 Leila July 2, 2008 at 11:00 am

I agree for the most part, but I also think that age plays for a factor. When I was 18-25, I was either dating or in a relationship without thinking about marriage. When I was in college I usually dated a few guys at a time and it was more about having fun than anything long-term. When I turned 25, then i was thinking about marriage and changed my criteria about the type of man that I was looking for. Men are trickier to figure out and I think that they take their time more than women and don’t settle. They will date as long as they need until they find the one.

Reply

237 gigi July 2, 2008 at 11:02 am

My prince has come, but every now and then he ribits.

Reply

238 genius khan July 2, 2008 at 11:15 am

good one gigi, he ribbits. heh, heh, heh…

Reply

239 Intellectual Hedonist July 2, 2008 at 12:54 pm

“My prince has come, but every now and then he ribits”

The ultimate T shirt

Reply

240 GOODENess July 2, 2008 at 4:03 pm

“My prince has come, but every now and then he ribits.”

@GIGI (love the name, BTW) you are a funny one…this one almost made me bite my tongue ring again…

“he ribbits”…FUNNY SHIT!!!!

Reply

241 soulfirelp July 2, 2008 at 11:08 am

congrats gigi!

I’m optimistic yet nonchalant

Reply

242 jess July 2, 2008 at 11:31 am

Hm. I just started reading this book and the first couple of chapters explains how the author came to her conclusions of men and her sexuality. I wish I could just paste straight excerpts in here because they pertain to discussions on this board almost directly. Ie, the notion of sexual freedom through promiscuity, the role parents play in its oppression, society’s responses to an attractive female and how it molds the identities of those females. But that would be much too long. I’m only on chapter 3 and Ive already got like 12 passages I want to share.

(I also wonder if it would change your perspectives on the excerpts if I told you that the book was about how a girl with no sexual abuse in her history, coming from good parents and schooling and neighborhoods, ended up slipping into the world of stripping.)

Reply

243 Intellectual Hedonist July 2, 2008 at 12:52 pm

you have peaked my interest, I’m off to the beach tomorrow I need a good read, what’s the name of the book?

Reply

244 jess July 2, 2008 at 4:45 pm

lol =]

BARE: The Naked Truth About Stripping, by Elisabeth Eaves

Reply

245 jess July 2, 2008 at 4:46 pm

but again, im only on chapter 3 so i have no idea how the books going to pan out. so far the first 3 chapters are good.

Reply

246 utc115 July 2, 2008 at 11:39 am

well here is my 2 cents…….

I had this conversation recently with a guy that I know. I just think men should be honest. and we dont have alot of honest men out there. I mean if u just want to hook up with me for a piece of ass just tell me that maybe we can work something out or maybe I will pass. But dont string me along with no intention of anything ever poppin off. I am not a Wii, XBox or Playstation 3 so I am not for the games.

The sad part is after we have been set up so many times we ignore the good men. But the good men might be good looking. he might be skinny. he might have alot of money. But I think we as women live and hope for a FAIRY TALE lifestyle. Its good to have u a list of things that you want but 9 times out of 10 you wont get everything you want.

Men and Women are a work in progress. If men knew everything about women and women knew every about men would we learn anything.

Reply

247 willnotbetelevised July 2, 2008 at 12:35 pm

Still waiting….

Reply

248 soulfirelp July 2, 2008 at 12:39 pm

@utc115
“FAIRY TALE lifestyle”

that lifestyle exist in a lot of women’s minds. especially if you grew up watching disney movies..ha
I would always say “I want to be married by 25!” Well that year is done, now what? I learned that life moves at different speeds for everyone.

after really thinking about this topic and reflecting on past relationships, I can say that men are simple. We as women(talking about myself here) come to the table with all sort of expectations and misconceptions. Instead of relaxin and listening so we can hear what the guy is saying, we try to infuse our thoughts onto him.

if a guy says he’s not ready for marriage, we as women might say to ourselves he’s not ready yet…but, as time goes along he’ll come around b/c I’m a good woman. maybe….maybe NOT!
Ladies(myself included) we have to listen b/c a man will let you know exactly how he sees you. My mistakes have been satisfying physical needs too soon and expecting him to love me later. It never happened!

If a lasting relationship is what you want then you might have to sacrifice your carnal desires until you are sure ya’ll see eye to eye. If sex is what you want then don’t expect the world afterwards. Enjoy the ride…literally(grin)

you as an individual have to understand your wants and ignore all the social expectations

Reply

249 Mikki July 2, 2008 at 12:57 pm

Can you be my twin ?? I think I am up to quadruplets.
You hit the nail right on the head on this!!

Reply

250 soulfirelp July 2, 2008 at 1:10 pm

lol….they say we’re all related anyway right!

Reply

251 gigi July 2, 2008 at 1:40 pm

“you as an individual have to understand your wants and ignore all the social expectations”

What manual is that in?

Reply

252 Mikki July 2, 2008 at 1:44 pm

I’m guessin the book of hard-knocks

Reply

253 miss t-lee July 2, 2008 at 1:57 pm

It’s not a self-help book, I know that for sure. LOL

Reply

254 soulfirelp July 2, 2008 at 2:52 pm

the manual of what I was feelin at the time..lol

Reply

255 Mikki July 2, 2008 at 1:47 pm

I personally don’t want to be 40+ pushing out kids, i mean my skin can only stretch so far, I can’t imagine that lookin cute unless i got millions to tuck it suck it and squeeze it back in

Reply

256 gigi July 2, 2008 at 1:50 pm

Can you image going through menopause while your children enter puberty.

Reply

257 Mikki July 2, 2008 at 1:57 pm

nope its amazing my lil bro is still alive, cuz my mom had many opportunities to hang him off the balcony and i will most def charge it to the menopause or whatever she had going on lol. not a good look

Reply

258 Xquizzyt1 July 2, 2008 at 2:08 pm

ROFLMAO!!! Hilarious. My little brother came along when my mother was in her 30′s so she might have missed the menopause/puberty thing, but yeah that’s some shit. Especially if it’s a GIRL going through puberty. Wooo lawd. I know how I was… so I CAN’T imagine dealing with a little me while I’m hot flashing. Luckily I’m in law school… so I can get me outta jail. LOL

Reply

259 Mikki July 2, 2008 at 3:10 pm

“Luckily I’m in law school… so I can get me outta jail. LOL”

now that was funny!!

Reply

260 Intellectual Hedonist July 2, 2008 at 1:58 pm

not only the pushing them out at 40 but can you imagine being mid 40 chasing a toddler, I’m about 10 years away from that and the thought of it gives me cold sweats…

Reply

261 Mikki July 2, 2008 at 2:05 pm

yea right the thought of it makes me wanna go have a baby right now and get it over with!!!

Reply

262 Xquizzyt1 July 2, 2008 at 2:06 pm

LOL I can definitely imagine it, as it is my fate… however, if I had to imagine me at mid-40′s chasing a toddler, or at mid-teens chasing one, I pick the mid-40′s any day. =)

Reply

263 The Comeback Girl July 2, 2008 at 2:13 pm

“LOL I can definitely imagine it, as it is my fate… however, if I had to imagine me at mid-40’s chasing a toddler, or at mid-teens chasing one, I pick the mid-40’s any day. =)”

***cues the choir to sing “how I got over” led by Mary Mary, Aretha Franklin and Chaka Khan***

Praise GOD I wasn’t nobody’s mother at 15. Age isn’t what it used to be ANYWAY. 40 isn’t ideal but there are lots of women who didn’t rule it out. And I’m not going to make piss poor excuses for a man just so I can have a baby. And I won’t allow a man to dictate his behavoir based on what he thinks my fertilization period is.

And last time I checked, Most women are holding up pretty damn well for 40.

Reply

264 Intellectual Hedonist July 2, 2008 at 4:10 pm

@ Xquizzyt1~ Oh HELL YES! I pick mid 40′s over teenage years any day, twice on Sunday and 3 times on all of the High Holy days regardless of the religion

Reply

265 gigi July 2, 2008 at 2:09 pm

Or funding their college tuition with your retirement.

Reply

266 Mikki July 2, 2008 at 2:13 pm

hahaha!! ya know it!!

Reply

267 Xquizzyt1 July 2, 2008 at 2:04 pm

Yeah I said that too at 20-something, with no kids. But if you wait for the “right” time, sometimes, the right time is 40. I’ll be 38 this year and still no children. Not because I’ve never been married, been down the aisle twice… and regardless of how I’m supposed to be wired, I just never felt like it was the right time for me to procreate. So now it looks like it will happen in my 40′s, and I’m certain I’ll be a better parent for it.

Reply

268 Mikki July 2, 2008 at 2:08 pm

I don’t think anyone would be an advocate of having a child when your not ready or “young” but physically I don’t want to be 40 even if i am in good shape and health chasing a baby, then 50 going to my kids class and they be like is that your grandma???

Reply

269 gigi July 2, 2008 at 2:16 pm

On the other hand, my parents were older and I think it made them better parents. My mother was 38 and my father was 56, when I was born.

Reply

270 Mikki July 2, 2008 at 2:22 pm

wow!! thats great I certainly dont want to be an iggnant momma but thats why I don’t have kids now but my values are working towards me being a good parent when im older. But I still don’t want be 40+ If i get that old without childent I will just adopt a child thats potty trained can speak and not run me around the house like a mad woman and mess up my figure!! I think age 8 is a good number

Reply

271 GOODENess July 2, 2008 at 4:26 pm

@mikki…. “8 is a good number”…man ya’ll are on that funny ish for real today…HI(fuggin)LARIOUS!!!

Reply

272 genius khan July 2, 2008 at 3:14 pm

gigi ya daddy was 56 and ya momma was 38 when you were born. it’s like i wanna write a song about that shit. the song would be to, for and about you gigi but not revealed until the end. the lyrics would b about the life of pappi and his pull on mammis. pappi pulled him a young 1 and probably with lil to no effort. dudes who I see do this are usually madd fly and/or madd paid. very, very inscrescring.

Reply

273 gigi July 2, 2008 at 3:21 pm

Your comments begs for me to smack you upside the head with my purse and yell, “Fred Sanford! You ole FOOL!”

Reply

274 genius khan July 2, 2008 at 3:33 pm

gigi: knock me up side my head, Fred Sanford.

heh, heh, heh, hah whooooo…….

Reply

275 The Comeback Girl July 2, 2008 at 2:20 pm

I think its ultimately how we define what age is. Most of the women I know including family and friends (in their 40s) could give a 20 year old a run for her money.

If people are living well into their 80s today. I don’t want to be 50 and feel like I’m all tapped out cause I crammed all the life I thought I was going to live into my first 40 years.

I won’t cry either way. If kids are in my destiny, I’m certainly not going to try and convince a man today that at 33 that I need to have them tommorrow.

The 40s and the 50s I know today looks too damn good for all of that stressin.

Reply

276 genius khan July 2, 2008 at 3:19 pm

ya know comeback i know some granny luvs that ae just as fly as some of the 20-30 yr olds i do. imean know. heh, heh, heh…

really though, i feel ya.

i don’t have children yet either and i’m not stressing over it. hope i never have to with or without them.

Reply

277 miss t-lee July 2, 2008 at 2:18 pm

at the rate I’m going–this will probably be me. :)
My Mom already had 4 by now.

Reply

278 GOODENess July 2, 2008 at 2:58 pm

“But maybe it’s not for me to really understand anyway. Maybe that’s the beauty that is women. ”

this made me smile… really big… :)

Reply

279 Mikki July 2, 2008 at 4:30 pm

“@mikki…. “8 is a good number”…man ya’ll are on that funny ish for real today…HI(fuggin)LARIOUS!!!”

I was serious tho not HIGH I promise lol smoken gives me the munchies and im trying to watch my figure, got to if i plan on being 40 with babies!!!

Reply

280 Treezy F. Baby July 2, 2008 at 6:23 pm

“We [men] let all the whorishness out of our system and then decide its time to settle down and get us a wife and make a family.”

Just last week I was hit on by a married man… I told him he scared me because now my belief in the above idea is pretty much shot. He told me that it should be because that idea is one of the greatest myths women believe about men. He basically told me that he was a whore before he was married and he still was…whoring is not a phase, it is a part of a person’s nature. At this point, I think that it’s he that is the very smart brotha about this and not you, my dear Country-In-Central-America-with-the-canal-that-used-to-be-ours. :)

Reply

Leave a Comment

{ 2 trackbacks }

Previous post:

Next post: